See it - Think it - Say it

Straight to the point and NO bull

Staggering Increase In Councils Wage Bill

Posted by johnfranklyn on October 1st, 2008

Have YourSay 24 Hours A day on  www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk  

Staggering Increase In Council Wage Bill

 

Whilst the cost of living is rising steeply, the cost of maintaining elected members has increased by approximately £130,000 from next year, monies have been removed from libraries, homeless storage, meals on wheels increased, carers having to pay more for their care, the cost of salaries have increased within Telford and Wrekin Council by over
 
£6,700,000 (£6.7 million)
 
During the year 2007 / 2008
 
Yet staffing levels have only increased by 109 over the same period.
 
Further statistics are as follows
 
 
The total wage bill for the Council was as follows:-
2005/2006     -            £124,422,123
2006/2007     -            £137,206,304
2007/2008     -            £143,945,532
 
The total number of staff employed by the Council is a follows:-
2005/2006     =          5838
2006/2007     =          6013
2007/2008     =          6122
 
Telford and Wrekin Councils wage bill has increased by
 
£19,523,409 (£19.5 million) in a 3 year period.
 
As a tax payer, do you feel you receive value for money?
 
How much of this increase is to the Directors of T&W Council, which as recently identified, the top earners within the council have increased by in excess of £1,000,000. This increase means, those earning £50,000 and above have taken approximately one sixth of the pay rise that covers 6122 employees.
 
After the recent debacle over Concessionary Bus Fares and Telford Town Park, those posts certainly need a review pdq and slimmed down considerably.
 
Chief Executive
 
The Chief Executive certainly seems to be on a nice little earner with the following
 
Pay increments made to the Council’s Chief Executive were as follows:-
2005/2006     -           £20K delayed external salary review from 2000 when the then new Chief   Executive was appointed
2006/2007     -           £4425
2007/2008     -           £3822 
 
Whilst the Council monitor the cost of FOI requests, they have no idea how much a complaint costs. A number of businesses who operate world wide have estimated the cost of a complaint to be £250, yet T&W Council state
 
Accordingly the Council does not hold the information requested in relation to the cost of administering the Council’s Complaints Procedures and the number of staff employed in administering the complaints system.
 
Surely you would expect them to have an estimated cost of complaints, yet they have made the following payments under their complaints policy
 
Without prejudice, ex gratia payments were made as follows (these are payments made following complaints, but not necessarily issued because of the council’s “wrongdoing”)
 
2005/2006 = £509.66
2006/2007 = £54.17
2007/2008 = £2705.00
 
If the Council are prepared to increase salaries by £6.7 million, surely you would expect them to at least estimate the cost of a complaint.
 
Now you know how much the Council spends on wages and have seen the staggering increase over a period of 3 years,
 
Do you feel that you are receiving value for money?
 
 Have Your Say 24 Hours A day on       www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk 
Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

What Happens To Your Waste

Posted by johnfranklyn on September 30th, 2008

Read More and Comment at www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk

WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR WASTE

 

Over Recent Months, there has been considerable concern throughout the UK, that our waste could and is in some cases ending up in foreign lands polluting a wide variety of unsuspecting communities.

Whilst the by weekly waste collection is of concern to a number of residents, we can rest assured that Telford and Wrekin Council’s Waste procedures are working to ensure that our waste is NOT polluting foreign soil.

The checks and policies that Telford and Wrekin Council Waste Management employ, certainly seem to be very robust and are closely monitored.

It is important to note that some of the material collected for recycling can, once it has been processed in this country and is no longer classed as a waste but as a material, end up in countries such as China as this is where the raw material is needed for further manufacturing.

Notes of Checks and explanation from T&W Council

We are very conscious of the efforts made by many residents of the Borough to recycle materials and are endeavouring to provide more recycling opportunities at the same time as encouraging more residents to utilise the existing ones. Clearly reducing the amount of waste we produce in the first place is another of our key objectives.

All of the waste management team at the Council are committed recyclers and we maintain keen interest in recycling matters for professional as well as personal reasons. We, like you, are concerned to see that materials are not only reused or recycled but that the whole waste management system is as sustainable as possible. It concerns us when we see coverage of UK wastes being deposited in other countries and we are as concerned as you to see that this does not happen to Telford and Wrekin wastes.

The Council has the responsibility to deliver against waste reduction, recycling and diversion from landfill targets. As part of the process of delivering waste services we have to make returns to Government accurately reporting weights of recyclables and residual wastes, the methods of collection, handling, reuse, recycling and disposal also naming the third parties involved as an overall duty of care.

Delivering these services also accounts for a significant part of the Councils expenditure and is therefore subject to significant checking. For these reasons we employ a number of means to track and audit the waste and recyclable material movements through the service. These checks extend to the recyclable materials we collect at the kerbside, bring banks and CRC sites.

The Council does not provide any of the waste management services directly, instead we employ contractors appointed after competitive tendering processes. The bulk of the waste service is provided under a contract with Telford Waste Services (TWS) but some elements are also provided under contract with SITA. Some smaller scale contracts are also made direct by the Council. In turn the major contractors, TWS and SITA, have their own contracts with organisations for recycling which have to be approved by the Council.

Getting a material from the point of collection to final recycling can involve several stages. Few of the materials collected are delivered to recyclers direct without being mixed with materials from other locations either because they are delivered to facilities in and around Telford where they are bulked or because they are collected as part of ‘milk round’ collection services. Where materials are handled by third parties mixing, bulking and storage of materials are all likely to occur as these processes allow them to maximise any income associated with the material. It is therefore a complex task to track purely the materials collected in Telford and Wrekin while endeavouring to work within the constraints imposed by working via contractors.

The main ways in which recyclable materials reach recyclers are:-

• Direct to the re-processor (delivered to or collected by them from site);
• Via one or more merchants; and
• Into compliance schemes run by others (e.g. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) where the scheme operators place containers on Council sites

The council receive claims for payment for collection and transport from the various contractors. These are backed up with evidence that the services have been carried out. For recyclables and residual wastes the evidence is in the form of weight tickets. Data from the claim and weight tickets provides the basis of the returns and checks the Council makes.

We use the following methods to exercise a duty of care in respect of the respect of the materials collected on our behalf:-

• Restrict what we collect to materials that we know can be recycled;
• Collect the materials separately with residents having separated them at home;
• Only use recyclers who manage contaminants from their processes responsibly;
• Only use recyclers who maximise the amount of material they recycle;
• Require weight evidence for materials sent from our sites for recycling;
• Require weight evidence for materials as they arrive at re-processors; and
• Carry out checks on procedures at companies handling materials from our collections.

We know that there are rejects from certain of the recyclable material streams resulting from the removal of contamination during processes. For example relatively small amounts such as plastic wrappers on some magazines sent to paper recycling mills.

In terms of the checks we make on the waste movements through our systems we carry out the following:-

1. We require weight information for all of the materials collected from our sites and at the kerbside. The information is in the form of weight tickets. Where weighing devices are used for charging purposes the devices have to be subject to regular third party checking for accuracy. We also carry out spot checks on the weigh bridges etc to ensure that operatives are correctly recording waste types and origins.
2. We receive claims for payment in electronic format but we carry out checks on the electronic information against the weight information. Any discrepancies have to be resolved or payment is withheld. Where the electronic information does not match the weight evidence the weight evidence is also amended.
3. Where the Council is paying one of its contractors to transport material direct to recyclers or merchants we still require weight information in order to certify that the material has been delivered.
4. We record information about rejected loads and of contaminants returned to our contractors for disposal.
5. We carry out audits of which merchants and reprocessors our contractors are using.

Attached with this letter is a breakdown of the routes our materials follow, based on which contractor collects them. The information also details the third parties and reprocessors involved.

It is important to note that some of the material collected for recycling can, once it has been processed in this country and is no longer classed as a waste but as a material, end up in countries such as China as this is where the raw material is needed for further manufacturing.

 www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

A Review Of Events

Posted by johnfranklyn on September 17th, 2008

A review of recent events

 

Telford Town Park has achieved national notoriety, but unfortunately, it has been for all the wrong reasons, but where did it all start.

 

The initial problems with the Town Park started when the Labour administration carried a strategic move of introducing new boundaries to the Town Park.

 

In essence, this gives the Town Park two Boundaries, a political boundary and the real external boundary, unfortunately, this now means that developers are crawling all over the place to build in the area of the political boundary and the real boundary.

 

Although, a group named ‘Friends of The Town Park’ was developed, this gave the impression of community involvement, but realistically, they are merely an extension of the Council.

 

The real credit for raising the needs of the Town Park goes to HOOP, who raised the profile of the Town Park to new heights. HOOP are the real knowledge and drive behind the Town Park.

 

The issues of Telford Town Park have been hidden behind technicalities, political jargon, lies and closed doors.

 

The fortune of the ‘Jewel in the crown’ appeared to have changed, with the change of administration.

 

The original lottery application was stopped and we entered into the promised open and honest council and consultation.

 

This proved to be nothing more than a hoax.

Read more On Our Web Site        www.tefordcouncilwach.orguk

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The Wind Of Change

Posted by johnfranklyn on September 7th, 2008

From - www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk

The Wind of Change
 
Social Housing is on the agenda as a priority, but it has taken two years of pushing to do it.
 
Numerous letters, emails and discussions with Members of Parliament and Councillors, most of which were ignored, even by the Councillor responsible for housing and is or was listed as a Director of the WHT.
 
It has to be said the Wrekin Housing Trust certainly snapped up a bargain when they bought approximately 13,000 houses from Telford and Wrekin Council, they then employed a strategy of selling stock at an alarming rate and  now hold a stock of approximately 10,000.
 
Whilst the Wrekin Housing Trust continue to sell, which adds to the housing burden, they have to be questioned and made to answer as to why they sell so many so often and why do they build out of the borough. It is suggested that they are now investing in news builds within the area of the potteries.
 
Hardly fair to the residents of Telford and Wrekin is it?
 
The following link highlights a residents struggle, unfortunately, this kind of story is becoming accepted as the rule, rather than the exception,
 
 
As identified in the Shropshire Star of 3rd September 2008 the waiting list has almost doubled. Here the Wrekin Housing Trust are playing a game of smoke and mirrors, blaming the increase on rising house prices, failing to mention the policy to sell, if a property requires £8000 or more work to be carried out on it. The WHT need to accept that their sales policy plays a great part in the increased housing need.
 
In order for the WHT to provide the best for the residents, there has to be a need for all to buy into the idea, here is a piece from an internal email of the WHT, sent from a Director of the Trust to a staff member, I was copied in
 
“Thanks xxxx, nice reply.
Not sure if Debbie mentioned to you but I have been contacted by the telford council watch group. I am going to do a reply later today and will copy you in. It will have to be very non committal”
 
Here is a clear indication of the Trust Director, giving praise on what was a “fob off” displaying the secretive institutionalised attitude they have.
 
Residents have many genuine concerns that need addressing as a matter of urgency and a policy of honesty from ALL Social Landlords needs to be endorsed.
 
I do have a question for Nathan Rous who wrote a piece about Campaign Groups and how he would support a Campaign group about Campaign Groups.
 
This is one Campaign Group that played a part in kick starting the Sutton Hill Regeneration, the Housing Summit, would you now come forward and say, they can work when done correctly?
 
Below is the email that prompted a response from MP David Wright, ultimately leading to the Housing Summit.
 
After having given MP David Wright a hard time on a number of occasions, I will now publicly praise him for his approach to myself, the time he afforded myself and the way in which he handling this.
 
I personally believe it took a real man to do what he did and I will say to everyone that he was extremely positive about pushing this forward and has already made considerable in roads with regards the Housing Summit.
 
Whilst this could’ve been done sometime ago, maybe it’s fortunate it didn’t as housing is right at the top of the government’s agenda.
 
Unfortunately the same cannot be said about MP Mark Pritchard, who does not respond to his Constituency, but it must be hard when your visiting McCain and the Dalai Lama.
 
Below is a copy of the email sent out to many including MP Mark Pritchard, MP Caroline Flint and a number of borough Councillors.
 
 
 
 
 Housing Summit
 
As you will be aware, the last 18 months or so have seen the Social Housing waiting list in the Borough of Telford and Wrekin increase from 5000 to 11,000.
 
As you know, the issue of Social Housing is somewhat complexed and with a growing population the future housing needs are only going to increase.
 
The issues facing the Borough of Telford and Wrekin and the need for Social Housing are further compounded by issues such
 
* An ageing population
* Increased needs by young people aged 16 to 25 years
* The Sales of current housing stock
* Housing not being replaced after sales are completed
* A growing population linked with the dash for City Status
* An unfair Choice on Choose Your Home ie – All houses available in the all bands section are allocated to those in the Urgent band thus negating the need for this banding.
 
And many more issues besides.
 
Having assisted a number of residents gain a home of their own or even simply emergency accommodation, I am alarmed at the clear discrimination faced by those residents who are disabled and find themselves a victim of Disability Discrimination through no fault of their own, but more because they were honest and declared a disability in the belief they would be treated fairly.
 
An able bodied resident can apply for up to three house per week therefore have a opportunity to apply for 150 houses annually. When compared to that of a disabled resident the discrimination becomes clear as their annual choice is restricted to about six per annum. Although they can apply, they will not receive equal consideration because of their disability.
 
The argument for this policy seems to revolve around the issue of adaptions. The needed adaptions for many disabled residents could be easily catered for as they are aids that can be easily transferred from one property to another without any cost to the Social Housing Landlord.
 
Other issues further compound the problems as residents can be injected into the housing waiting list from outside agencies, giving the impression of queue jumping, therefore it is not uncommon to find a single person in for example a three bed property or a partially adapted house, suitable for disabled residents being allocated to able bodied residents.
 
The social housing waiting list consists of a wide range of residents going back as long as 1992, by any standards, this is not acceptable.
 
Whilst the whole issue is complex, what I do firmly believe is “doing nothing” is no longer an option. It is not about now, next week or even next year, It is about our children, grandchildren and beyond.
 
It only takes an adverse twist of fate and anyone of us could find ourselves on the street and in the need of Social Housing.
 
As the moves towards a Housing Summit appear to have come to grinding halt, myself and other residents are going to arrange a Housing Summit and will forward invitations forward to yourselves accordingly.
 
I respectfully ask that you put your weight behind it, raise the genuine concerns of residents, put politics to one side and start the wheels of motion towards constructive change which an extremely important Social Issue effecting many in our communities.
 
I will arrange a venue, an agenda, invitations and a warm welcome. I hope you will take part.
 
The wind of change is blowing gently in favour of the resident, I for one intend to turn it into a full scale hurricane.

www.tefordcouncilwatch.org.uk

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

EP A442

Posted by johnfranklyn on September 7th, 2008

From - www.telfordcouncilwatc.org.uk
Now we know why Andrew Eade, Steve Bentley and Nick Kitchen will not answer my email about the EP A442. Despite having gone through customer services and my email being forwarded to Andrew Eade, he again has not answered,
 
Now We Know why!!
 
It is very clear that Telford and Wrekin Council do not have a clue what is happening. Telford and Wrekin Council have changed the way they use their statistics so often, they are completely lost and do not offer the same information to anyone who asks the same or similar questions.
 
In the latest FOI about the EP A442 issued on the 30 06 08, the Council are saying the following,
 
1. A442 Queensway post scheme (1/07/06 - 15/06/08)
 
Accidents involving traffic signs/traffic signals          2
Total number of accidents                                       34 
 
2. A442 Queensway 3 years pre-scheme 30/06/03 - 1/07/06)
 
Accidents involving traffic signs/traffic signals          9
Total number of accidents                                       80
 
3. Information currently not held by Council
4. Information currently not held by Council
 
5a. One vehicle accidents Great Britain 2005 - Non built up roads (over 40mph, excluding motorways)
 
Accidents involving traffic signs/traffic signal          787
Total number of accidents                                     47,950
 
Source: Road Casualties Great Britain 2005, Department for Transport
 
5b. Telford and Wrekin Borough wide accidents (1/7/2006 - 15/06/2008)
 
Accidents involving traffic sign/traffic signal                13
Total number of accidents                                         762
 
6. The aim of the scheme implemented in June 2006 was to address the continuing rise in accidents by introducing a lower speed limit and a change in the carriageway layout, which more accurately reflected current highway design standards. This created a safer environment that encouraged a change in driver attitude and behaviour along the route. In this respect the scheme has been successful in almost halving the number of accidents in both 2006 and 2007 from the 30 recorded in 2005. There are currently no plans to change the speed limit back to 70mph as accident numbers remain significantly lower than those prior to the schemes introduction.
 
7. The Council commissioned a Stage Three Road Safety Audit following completion of the work on the A442 Local Safety Scheme. The Safety Audit was carried out by a qualified audit team from consultants Jacobs with comments from West Mercia Police. The purpose of the Safety Audit is to review the design of the scheme from a drivers point of view and they rarely make comments regarding the number of signs unless there is a issue of reduced visibility. As part of the improvements to the A442, passively safe sign posts were introduced along the whole 9.5km route. Passively safe posts conform to BS EN 12767:2000 requirements to minimise vehicle impact in the event of a collison. These posts replaced less suitable steel or aluminium posts which no longer conformed to updated safety guidance. 
 
So, just what is the truth about the EP A442?
 
Is it the above?
 
Or is it as stated recently and covered by the Shropshire Star and BBC and then advertised in new signage along the EP A442,
 
2006 – Accidents 17 Casualties 21
2007 - Accidents 16 Casualties 29
 
This clearly brings into question the statistics issued by the Council on 27th July 2007 as follows
 
 I can provide you with the following information in relation to your request for information on the A442 Queensway.
 
         Length of route studied – 9.5km (excludes Trench Lock Interchange)
 
         The previous casualty figures (174 in 5 years) were recorded during the period 1/7/2001 to 30/06/2005
 
         Alterations to the A442 road layout commenced 22 May and finished 21 June 2006. Some direction signing had been completed prior to this date.
 
         The previous 5 year accident figure for KSI was 5 Fatal and 12 Serious.
 
         There were a total of 101 accidents recorded in the five year period.  22% of these involved shunts, traffic speeds involved in the accidents are not recorded. The shunts were recorded at the following sections.
 
o        Trench Lock to Wombridge – 1
o        Wombridge to Greyhound – 0
o        Greyhound to Holinswood – 5
o        Holinswood to Randlay – 4
o        Randlay to Stirchley – 8
o        Stirchley to Brockton Loop – 3
o        Brockton loop to Brockton R’bt – 1
 
         On the casualty boards, the five year figures were amended because the previous casualty figures (above) were calculated from mid year to mid year. If we had simply up dated this figure as a rolling 5 year total we would have been faced with two issues. The first would have been that there would have been a rise in casualty totals displayed because the next mid year total from 30/06/2005 to 1/07/06 was greater than the total we were losing from 2001/02. The displayed totals would have reflected the continuing rise in casualty rates along the old route and not the reduced number as a result of the works undertaken. It was decided to promote a more positive message to the public by changing the headline casualty figures to a calendar year which would allow at least six months of data to reflect the new A442 works. Hence the drop in casualties from 42 in 2005 to 21 in 2006.
 
         The Council has considered the location of the casualty boards and does not consider them to be in a dangerous position or distracting to drivers.
 
         The total cost of the A442 Queensway works, including signing and traffic management was £634,541.63
 
         The Institute of Highways and Transportation (IHT) requested submissions for their annual awards. Telford and Wrekin entered a submission under the Road Safety ‘Reducing all Casualties’ category. I attach a copy of the submission for your information.  There was no charge to the Authority for this submission. The cost for attending the award ceremony at the National Maritime Museum Greenwich, was £1200. However I would add that as a centre of excellence for local transport delivery it is important to share beat practice with other Authorities and agencies and attendance at such events achieves this. It also helps raises the profile of successful schemes in the Borough.
 
Telford and Wrekin Council made an astonishing admittance
 
 
“It was decided to promote a more positive message to the public by changing the headline casualty figures to a calendar year”
 
This claim is astonishing and shows that Telford and Wrekin Council changed statistics with the aim of looking good.
 
Is the EP A442 safer or isn’t it?
 
One thing we are certain of is – Telford and Wrekin Council have been completely incompetent over the handling of the EP A442.
 
Maybe Andrew Eade and the conservative Administration will one day provide the open and honest council they promised.
 
This is one issue that Proves beyond any reasonable doubt that
 
“They are not being open and honest”
 

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Weight loss Tablet

Posted by johnfranklyn on December 26th, 2007

allipill2512_228×354.jpgGreat idea. A tablet that will cost about a £1 a time could be going on sale in the UK in the New Year.

It could increase weight loss by upto 50%, but lets face it, it will only work if you are already eating sensibly and take some form of exercise on a regular basis.

I see it possibly being a good aid for those who have gained alot of weight through some medical condition, but otherwise it is likely to throw alot of people into a false sense of security.

Jst how many more people are going to gain weight or how many people have gained alot of weight through over eating and lack of exercise, but will think,

” I can keep eating and just take a tablet”

the carryon throwing burgers down their necks.

I’m not convinced - are you?  

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in General, Medical | No Comments »

Get A new GP by January

Posted by johnfranklyn on December 25th, 2007

telford-pct.gif

A GP’s Practice in Oakengates has now written to patients who live outside their practice area to transfer to another practice.

Fair enough some may say –

but why now?

Some of the patients in a number of cases have been long term patients covering around 4 decades and could be entering into their senior years.

Apparently, the shift is down to a growth in patient numbers, but why should long term patients be expected to

up sticks and move to another practice,

be expected to develop another relationship with an unfamiliar doctor,

not to be told the full reasons,

I have contacted the practice concerned and their comment was,

“We don’t send out these letters - it’s the NHS”

Then put the phone down.

A member of Telford and Wrekin PCT has commented via email below

“I have liaised with colleagues regarding your query and am able to inform you that we are not aware of any GP practices redefining their practice areas within Telford & Wrekin. We are aware that one practice has written to patients who live outside their practice area asking them to transfer to another practice by the end of January”

These long term Patients now have until the end of January 2008 to find and register with another practice.

Does Telford and Wrekin PCT consider this action to be appropriate especially with patients who have been registered for some 40 years with the same practice?

Who made this decision?

What will happen if the patient cannot get registered at another practice?

Will the patient be refused access to treatment and / or a doctor should they fail to do so?

Is it a cos cutting exercis?

The patients are entitled to know more rather GP’s Practices trying to relocate patients without adequate information and a full explanation.

I now call on Telford and Wrekin PCT and the GP Practice concerned to come out into the open and offer a full explanation.

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in General, Telford | No Comments »

Quango missed targets

Posted by johnfranklyn on December 25th, 2007

advantagewestmidlandslogonewmed.jpgAdvantage West midlands have an annual budget of some £300 million of public money and claims to control over £1 billion of public money in the West Midlands, are cited as being one of Telford and Wrekin Councils Partners, but AWM’s performance is not meeting the required targets or expected standards.

Half year results for this unelected quango have now been released, but as Advantage West Midlands have only met 2 out 6 targets, its performance is, at best, poor.

Target 1

1 Employment Creation: Number of jobs created or safeguarded (including outputs relating to the National Coalfields Programme which are shared with English Partnerships).
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 13,347 17,653 6,211

Which equals 7136 short of their minimum target and at this rate will fall short of the target by the end of the year.

Target 2

2 Employment Support: Number of people assisted to get a job
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 4,306 5,695 3,856

Which equals 450 short of their minimum target but are on target for the year to beat their maximum target, if they do, I’m sure they will get a role over should a short fall happen in another year.

Target 3

Business Creation: Number of new businesses created and demonstrating growth after 12 months and & businesses attracted to the region (figures reported are the businesses created that survived for one year. The RDAs will review the figures reported to identify those businesses that have demonstrated growth through an increase in employment between 12 and 24 months from start of trading).
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 1,361 1,799 70

Which equals 1291 short of their minimum target, not even close for the annual target.

Target 4

Business Support: Number of businesses assisted to improve their performance
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 10,333 13,667 3,626

Which equals 6707 short of their minimum target and again is a shortfall for their annual target of over 3000

Target 4a

including -
4a Number of businesses within the region assisted to engage in new collaborations with the UK knowledge base
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 646 854 248

Which equals 398 short of the minimum target

Target 5

5 Regeneration: a) Public and private regeneration infrastructure investment levered
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range: Achieved in April – September 2007
£ million / (% private)
Minimum
£million
(% private) Maximum
£million
(% private)
Advantage West Midlands 172 (54) 228 (72) 52 (83)

b) Hectares of brownfield land reclaimed and/or redeveloped
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 129 171 3

Their fifth target is split into two - how much public and private infrastructure investment has been used and how much brownfield land has been redeveloped. They have minimum and maximum targets of £172m & £228m for the former and 129 & 171 hectares for the latter. They have so far levered £52m of investment which is £68m short of their minimum target if they continue at the current rate and they have redeveloped 3 hectares of brownfield land which is 123 hectares (or over 95%) short of their minimum target if they continue at the current rate.

(courtesy http://www.westmidlandsno.org.uk/wordpress/?p=271)

Target 6

6 Skills: Number of people assisted in their skills development as a result of RDA programmes (this target includes all results in Tables 6a and 6b)
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 18,083 23,917 9,313

6a Number of adults gaining basic skills as part of the Skills for Life Strategy that count towards the Skills PSA Target
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 5 7 68

Target number six is the number of people that AWM helped to develop skills. They have a minimum target of 18,083 and a maximum of 23,917. They have managed 9,313 so far which is 543 over their minimum target if they continue at the current rate.

(courtesy http://www.westmidlandsno.org.uk/wordpress/?p=271)

Adavatage West Midlands are failing to meet 4 of their 6 targets that have been set by Government.

This highly praised partner of Telford and Wrekin Council are failing, yet this Regional Development Agency are to receive greater powers and take over most of the West Midlands Regional Assembly’s powers, responsibilites and budget by 2010 when it is finally abolished.

Advantage West Midlands are one of the partners deciding the future of Telford,

Do you have confidence in them?

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in Quango's | No Comments »

Welcome to See it - Think it - Say it

Posted by johnfranklyn on December 25th, 2007

digital_activist_toolkit_1_.jpgWelcome to See it - Think it - Say it. Feel free to join in at any point.

You will not like everything I say, you will not agree with everything, all i can say is - TOUGH.

As time goes on, you will come round to my way of thinking, unless your one of these small minded freaks, hold on, it will be a bumpy ride.

Cool site: http://whataworld.blogpico.com :sent by ur frnd

Share This Post

Posted in General | No Comments »