Staggering Increase In Councils Wage Bill
Posted by johnfranklyn on October 1st, 2008
Have YourSay 24 Hours A day on www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk
Staggering Increase In Council Wage Bill
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on October 1st, 2008
Have YourSay 24 Hours A day on www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk
Staggering Increase In Council Wage Bill
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on September 30th, 2008
Read More and Comment at www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk
WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR WASTE
Over Recent Months, there has been considerable concern throughout the UK, that our waste could and is in some cases ending up in foreign lands polluting a wide variety of unsuspecting communities.
Whilst the by weekly waste collection is of concern to a number of residents, we can rest assured that Telford and Wrekin Council’s Waste procedures are working to ensure that our waste is NOT polluting foreign soil.
The checks and policies that Telford and Wrekin Council Waste Management employ, certainly seem to be very robust and are closely monitored.
It is important to note that some of the material collected for recycling can, once it has been processed in this country and is no longer classed as a waste but as a material, end up in countries such as China as this is where the raw material is needed for further manufacturing.
Notes of Checks and explanation from T&W Council
We are very conscious of the efforts made by many residents of the Borough to recycle materials and are endeavouring to provide more recycling opportunities at the same time as encouraging more residents to utilise the existing ones. Clearly reducing the amount of waste we produce in the first place is another of our key objectives.
All of the waste management team at the Council are committed recyclers and we maintain keen interest in recycling matters for professional as well as personal reasons. We, like you, are concerned to see that materials are not only reused or recycled but that the whole waste management system is as sustainable as possible. It concerns us when we see coverage of UK wastes being deposited in other countries and we are as concerned as you to see that this does not happen to Telford and Wrekin wastes.
The Council has the responsibility to deliver against waste reduction, recycling and diversion from landfill targets. As part of the process of delivering waste services we have to make returns to Government accurately reporting weights of recyclables and residual wastes, the methods of collection, handling, reuse, recycling and disposal also naming the third parties involved as an overall duty of care.
Delivering these services also accounts for a significant part of the Councils expenditure and is therefore subject to significant checking. For these reasons we employ a number of means to track and audit the waste and recyclable material movements through the service. These checks extend to the recyclable materials we collect at the kerbside, bring banks and CRC sites.
The Council does not provide any of the waste management services directly, instead we employ contractors appointed after competitive tendering processes. The bulk of the waste service is provided under a contract with Telford Waste Services (TWS) but some elements are also provided under contract with SITA. Some smaller scale contracts are also made direct by the Council. In turn the major contractors, TWS and SITA, have their own contracts with organisations for recycling which have to be approved by the Council.
Getting a material from the point of collection to final recycling can involve several stages. Few of the materials collected are delivered to recyclers direct without being mixed with materials from other locations either because they are delivered to facilities in and around Telford where they are bulked or because they are collected as part of ‘milk round’ collection services. Where materials are handled by third parties mixing, bulking and storage of materials are all likely to occur as these processes allow them to maximise any income associated with the material. It is therefore a complex task to track purely the materials collected in Telford and Wrekin while endeavouring to work within the constraints imposed by working via contractors.
The main ways in which recyclable materials reach recyclers are:-
• Direct to the re-processor (delivered to or collected by them from site);
• Via one or more merchants; and
• Into compliance schemes run by others (e.g. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) where the scheme operators place containers on Council sites
The council receive claims for payment for collection and transport from the various contractors. These are backed up with evidence that the services have been carried out. For recyclables and residual wastes the evidence is in the form of weight tickets. Data from the claim and weight tickets provides the basis of the returns and checks the Council makes.
We use the following methods to exercise a duty of care in respect of the respect of the materials collected on our behalf:-
• Restrict what we collect to materials that we know can be recycled;
• Collect the materials separately with residents having separated them at home;
• Only use recyclers who manage contaminants from their processes responsibly;
• Only use recyclers who maximise the amount of material they recycle;
• Require weight evidence for materials sent from our sites for recycling;
• Require weight evidence for materials as they arrive at re-processors; and
• Carry out checks on procedures at companies handling materials from our collections.
We know that there are rejects from certain of the recyclable material streams resulting from the removal of contamination during processes. For example relatively small amounts such as plastic wrappers on some magazines sent to paper recycling mills.
In terms of the checks we make on the waste movements through our systems we carry out the following:-
1. We require weight information for all of the materials collected from our sites and at the kerbside. The information is in the form of weight tickets. Where weighing devices are used for charging purposes the devices have to be subject to regular third party checking for accuracy. We also carry out spot checks on the weigh bridges etc to ensure that operatives are correctly recording waste types and origins.
2. We receive claims for payment in electronic format but we carry out checks on the electronic information against the weight information. Any discrepancies have to be resolved or payment is withheld. Where the electronic information does not match the weight evidence the weight evidence is also amended.
3. Where the Council is paying one of its contractors to transport material direct to recyclers or merchants we still require weight information in order to certify that the material has been delivered.
4. We record information about rejected loads and of contaminants returned to our contractors for disposal.
5. We carry out audits of which merchants and reprocessors our contractors are using.
Attached with this letter is a breakdown of the routes our materials follow, based on which contractor collects them. The information also details the third parties and reprocessors involved.
It is important to note that some of the material collected for recycling can, once it has been processed in this country and is no longer classed as a waste but as a material, end up in countries such as China as this is where the raw material is needed for further manufacturing.
www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on September 17th, 2008
A review of recent events
Telford Town Park has achieved national notoriety, but unfortunately, it has been for all the wrong reasons, but where did it all start.
The initial problems with the Town Park started when the Labour administration carried a strategic move of introducing new boundaries to the Town Park.
In essence, this gives the Town Park two Boundaries, a political boundary and the real external boundary, unfortunately, this now means that developers are crawling all over the place to build in the area of the political boundary and the real boundary.
Although, a group named ‘Friends of The Town Park’ was developed, this gave the impression of community involvement, but realistically, they are merely an extension of the Council.
The real credit for raising the needs of the Town Park goes to HOOP, who raised the profile of the Town Park to new heights. HOOP are the real knowledge and drive behind the Town Park.
The issues of Telford Town Park have been hidden behind technicalities, political jargon, lies and closed doors.
The fortune of the ‘Jewel in the crown’ appeared to have changed, with the change of administration.
The original lottery application was stopped and we entered into the promised open and honest council and consultation.
This proved to be nothing more than a hoax.
Read more On Our Web Site www.tefordcouncilwach.orguk
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on September 7th, 2008
From - www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on September 7th, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on December 26th, 2007
Great idea. A tablet that will cost about a £1 a time could be going on sale in the UK in the New Year.
It could increase weight loss by upto 50%, but lets face it, it will only work if you are already eating sensibly and take some form of exercise on a regular basis.
I see it possibly being a good aid for those who have gained alot of weight through some medical condition, but otherwise it is likely to throw alot of people into a false sense of security.
Jst how many more people are going to gain weight or how many people have gained alot of weight through over eating and lack of exercise, but will think,
” I can keep eating and just take a tablet”
the carryon throwing burgers down their necks.
I’m not convinced - are you?
Posted in General, Medical | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on December 25th, 2007
A GP’s Practice in Oakengates has now written to patients who live outside their practice area to transfer to another practice.
Fair enough some may say –
but why now?
Some of the patients in a number of cases have been long term patients covering around 4 decades and could be entering into their senior years.
Apparently, the shift is down to a growth in patient numbers, but why should long term patients be expected to
up sticks and move to another practice,
be expected to develop another relationship with an unfamiliar doctor,
not to be told the full reasons,
I have contacted the practice concerned and their comment was,
“We don’t send out these letters - it’s the NHS”
Then put the phone down.
A member of Telford and Wrekin PCT has commented via email below
“I have liaised with colleagues regarding your query and am able to inform you that we are not aware of any GP practices redefining their practice areas within Telford & Wrekin. We are aware that one practice has written to patients who live outside their practice area asking them to transfer to another practice by the end of January”
These long term Patients now have until the end of January 2008 to find and register with another practice.
Does Telford and Wrekin PCT consider this action to be appropriate especially with patients who have been registered for some 40 years with the same practice?
Who made this decision?
What will happen if the patient cannot get registered at another practice?
Will the patient be refused access to treatment and / or a doctor should they fail to do so?
Is it a cos cutting exercis?
The patients are entitled to know more rather GP’s Practices trying to relocate patients without adequate information and a full explanation.
I now call on Telford and Wrekin PCT and the GP Practice concerned to come out into the open and offer a full explanation.
Posted in General, Telford | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on December 25th, 2007
Advantage West midlands have an annual budget of some £300 million of public money and claims to control over £1 billion of public money in the West Midlands, are cited as being one of Telford and Wrekin Councils Partners, but AWM’s performance is not meeting the required targets or expected standards.
Half year results for this unelected quango have now been released, but as Advantage West Midlands have only met 2 out 6 targets, its performance is, at best, poor.
Target 1
1 Employment Creation: Number of jobs created or safeguarded (including outputs relating to the National Coalfields Programme which are shared with English Partnerships).
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 13,347 17,653 6,211
Which equals 7136 short of their minimum target and at this rate will fall short of the target by the end of the year.
Target 2
2 Employment Support: Number of people assisted to get a job
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 4,306 5,695 3,856
Which equals 450 short of their minimum target but are on target for the year to beat their maximum target, if they do, I’m sure they will get a role over should a short fall happen in another year.
Target 3
Business Creation: Number of new businesses created and demonstrating growth after 12 months and & businesses attracted to the region (figures reported are the businesses created that survived for one year. The RDAs will review the figures reported to identify those businesses that have demonstrated growth through an increase in employment between 12 and 24 months from start of trading).
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 1,361 1,799 70
Which equals 1291 short of their minimum target, not even close for the annual target.
Target 4
Business Support: Number of businesses assisted to improve their performance
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 10,333 13,667 3,626
Which equals 6707 short of their minimum target and again is a shortfall for their annual target of over 3000
Target 4a
including -
4a Number of businesses within the region assisted to engage in new collaborations with the UK knowledge base
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 646 854 248
Which equals 398 short of the minimum target
Target 5
5 Regeneration: a) Public and private regeneration infrastructure investment levered
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range: Achieved in April – September 2007
£ million / (% private)
Minimum
£million
(% private) Maximum
£million
(% private)
Advantage West Midlands 172 (54) 228 (72) 52 (83)
b) Hectares of brownfield land reclaimed and/or redeveloped
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 129 171 3
Their fifth target is split into two - how much public and private infrastructure investment has been used and how much brownfield land has been redeveloped. They have minimum and maximum targets of £172m & £228m for the former and 129 & 171 hectares for the latter. They have so far levered £52m of investment which is £68m short of their minimum target if they continue at the current rate and they have redeveloped 3 hectares of brownfield land which is 123 hectares (or over 95%) short of their minimum target if they continue at the current rate.
(courtesy http://www.westmidlandsno.org.uk/wordpress/?p=271)
Target 6
6 Skills: Number of people assisted in their skills development as a result of RDA programmes (this target includes all results in Tables 6a and 6b)
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 18,083 23,917 9,313
6a Number of adults gaining basic skills as part of the Skills for Life Strategy that count towards the Skills PSA Target
Regional Development Agency Annual Target Range Achieved April – September 2007
Minimum Maximum
Advantage West Midlands 5 7 68
Target number six is the number of people that AWM helped to develop skills. They have a minimum target of 18,083 and a maximum of 23,917. They have managed 9,313 so far which is 543 over their minimum target if they continue at the current rate.
(courtesy http://www.westmidlandsno.org.uk/wordpress/?p=271)
Adavatage West Midlands are failing to meet 4 of their 6 targets that have been set by Government.
This highly praised partner of Telford and Wrekin Council are failing, yet this Regional Development Agency are to receive greater powers and take over most of the West Midlands Regional Assembly’s powers, responsibilites and budget by 2010 when it is finally abolished.
Advantage West Midlands are one of the partners deciding the future of Telford,
Do you have confidence in them?
Posted in Quango's | No Comments »
Posted by johnfranklyn on December 25th, 2007
Welcome to See it - Think it - Say it. Feel free to join in at any point.
You will not like everything I say, you will not agree with everything, all i can say is - TOUGH.
As time goes on, you will come round to my way of thinking, unless your one of these small minded freaks, hold on, it will be a bumpy ride.
Posted in General | No Comments »